The Beehive & Bee Equipment Patent Archive

The patented pursuit of the perfect hive

IMPROVEMENT IN BEE-HIVES

A false wall on studs — and a lit viewing box for trapped moths

PatentUS 199,328
PatentedJanuary 15, 1878
InventorRubin Strawser
OfNekoda, Pennsylvania
FiledJune 30, 1877
Patent drawing of a wooden bee-hive showing a front elevation with an entrance platform and miller-box below, a longitudinal section with rows of comb-frames labeled D and E, a cross-section detailing the miller trap and bee-perch, and a perspective view of an end comb-frame with a separated back wall.
Fig. 1 — Front view of the bee-hive; Fig. 2 — Longitudinal central section of hive; Fig. 3 — Central cross-section showing frames and miller-box; Fig. 4 — Perspective detail of end comb-frame · click to zoom
Sheet 1 of the patentSheet 2 of the patentSheet 3 of the patentSheet 4 of the patent

A wooden bee-hive with detachable comb-frame walls

How it works

The hive has side walls with longitudinal shoulders B and C that support two rows of comb-frames, an upper row E and a lower row D. The end comb-frames F are built with a back or side wall f, separated from the frame by short studs f' to leave a bee-passage, preventing bees from attaching comb directly to the hive wall. A bee-perch H sits above a platform g, leading insects such as millers through an entrance into a miller-box G with front and rear chambers; a window k' with wire netting lets light attract the trapped insects into a viewable front chamber K. A cloth M covers the lower row of frames to retain heat, and plugs P block access to the upper row until the lower row is filled.

What was claimed

“In a bee-hive, the comb-frame F, having a back or side wall, f, separated from said frame by the studs f', substantially as and for the purpose specified.”

In plain English: The invention claims an end comb-frame with a separate back wall held apart by small studs, creating a bee-passage and preventing bees from gluing comb to the hive wall.

In the inventor’s words

“As is well known, millers and other insects are continually seeking entrance to bee-hives, attracted by the honey, and, if permitted to enter, discommode the bees, and millers especially would deposit their eggs, which develop worms.”— Rubin Strawser, from the specification

Commentary

Strawser's actual claim is narrower and smarter than the drawing's busy trap hardware suggests. His end comb-frames carry their own back wall, held off the frame by short studs to leave a bee-passage. The point: bees will glue comb to any flat surface within reach, so he gives them a sacrificial wall that travels with the frame. Pull the frame, and the propolis and burr comb come out with it instead of tearing loose from the hive body. It's a 1877 answer to the same problem Langstroth solved more elegantly with the bee space — leave the right gap and bees leave it alone. Strawser adds wood where Langstroth subtracted it.

The miller-box is the era's obsession on full display. The bee-perch H funnels wax moths down into a two-chamber trap below the entrance, and the wire-netted window k' uses light to lure captives into a front chamber where the beekeeper can inspect the catch. Fig. 2 rewards a close look: the plugs P blocking the upper frame row until the lower brood chamber fills is a crude but real supering discipline, and the cloth quilt M over the lower frames for warmth is standard good practice.

As a whole it's a workmanlike Pennsylvania entry in the crowded post-Langstroth decade — sound frames underneath, moth-trap theater on top. The trap would catch some moths and stop none of the worms already inside.

Paper patent — likely never produced

The studded double-wall frames and multi-chamber miller trap add cost with no documented manufacture or trade presence; no surviving example is known.

This drawing is free. It is a work of the United States government, published January 15, 1878, and has been in the public domain since the day it was printed. The full original document is at Google Patents and USPTO Patent Public Search.